Our work, and how you can check it

A full audit of a web product and its browser extension, across web and Windows 11. Manual evaluation with NVDA and keyboard-only navigation, against WCAG 2.2 Level AA, EN 301 549 and the European Accessibility Act. Both of us worked on it, so every finding was reviewed twice.

The main finding wasn't a long list of different problems. It was one problem, repeated screen after screen, in a component reused across the whole product. That completely changes the client's job: it isn't a hundred fixes, it's one fix done properly. Counting findings would have produced an alarming number and a misleading picture of the actual work.

What we delivered: a 29-page report with findings prioritized by severity, cognitive accessibility recommendations, and a draft accessibility statement in Spanish and English.

An accessibility report isn't a list of errors dumped out of a tool. Every report we deliver includes:

• The scope reviewed: which pages, which journeys and which components.
• The method and test environment: which screen readers, which browsers and which version of the standard.
• Each finding with the WCAG criterion it fails, its level, the steps to reproduce it and an acceptance criterion to close it.
• The full criteria table, including what passes. That's what an accessibility statement rests on.
• The proposed fix, not just the problem flagged.

The full service details explain what each service includes, and how it can be delivered.

You don't have to take our word for any of this. Run this site with a keyboard, with a screen reader, or at 400% zoom, and see whether it holds up. Our accessibility statement sets out what we meet, how we tested it, and what we don't claim.